III.—PERCEPTION AND INTERSUBJECTIVE INTERCOURSE
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Impasse, affectivity, and intersubjective systems.
An important development in the contemporary move from Cartesian isolated-mind thinking in psychoanalysis toward a post-Cartesian contextualism that recognizes the constitutive role of relatedness in the making of all experience has been the theoretical and clinical focus on the concept of intersubjectivity. Recent psychoanalytic discourse on intersubjectivity, however, has been clouded and bef...
متن کاملIntersubjective Externalism * Peter Pagin
In this paper I present the idea of a kind of externalism different from what is usually considered in the internalism / externalism debate. It is intersubjective in nature, since it concerns representation determined by relations between cognitive subjects. More precisely, it concerns linguistic expression types. The basic idea is that the meaning of linguistic expression types often depends o...
متن کاملObjective, Subjective and Intersubjective Selectors of Knowledge
It is argued that the acceptance of knowledge in a community depends on several, approximately independent selection "criteria". The objective criteria are distinctiveness, invariance and controllability, the subjective ones are individual utility, coherence, simplicity and novelty, and the intersubjective ones are publicity, expressivity, formality, collective utility, conformity and authority...
متن کاملIntersubjective Consistency of Knowledge and Belief
We consider interactive epistemic models where individuals are described by both their “knowledge” and their “beliefs”. Three intersubjective consistency conditions are examined: Intersubjective Caution (if an individual believes something to be common belief then he knows it to be common belief), Truth of Common Belief (only true facts are commonly believed) and Qualitative Agreement. These co...
متن کاملGlobal intercourse.
1596 www.thelancet.com Vol 374 November 7, 2009 direct engagement with countries, and weak design and assessment mechanisms. GAVI relies on in-country WHO and UNICEF staff , both better versed in immunisation than in health systems, and the Global Fund relies on country coordinating mechanisms whose members have disease-specifi c interests, mostly HIV. Both use panels in Geneva—the Independent ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Mind
سال: 1912
ISSN: 0026-4423,1460-2113
DOI: 10.1093/mind/xxi.84.508